Injection Molding
Tooling and molding for your repeat plastic parts.
From prototype to production, coordinated manufacturing solutions for your custom parts.
View All Services →
Precision parts for your tight tolerances and complex geometry.
Tooling and molding for your repeat plastic parts.

Metal casting options for your part and production volume.

Cutting, forming and welding for your fabricated parts.

Custom profiles for your section, length and finish requirements.

Finishes for your appearance, corrosion and wear requirements.

Sub-assemblies and final builds for your production program.

Production tooling built around your process and volume.

Prototype parts to check fit, function and design.
DFM, process planning and production support for your project.
Inspection, documentation, inventory and delivery planning for your program.
Choose air- or liquid-cooling components around your thermal and mechanical requirements.

Manufacturing support for your cold plates, manifolds and cooling assemblies.

Find components for your power electronics, energy, laser and telecom application.

Components for your electronic systems.
Start with your functional and quality requirements.
Build around your operating environment.
From prototype to production, review material performance, manufacturability and cost for your part.
Review grade, temper and finish for your metal parts.
AluminumStrength, weight and machining›
Stainless SteelCorrosion and finish requirements›
Carbon & Alloy SteelDiscuss grade and heat treatment›
Tool SteelDiscuss tooling and wear needs›
TitaniumReview grade and part geometry›
Copper & Brass & BronzeDiscuss conductivity and machining›Match your polymer to function, process and environment.
ABSReview enclosure and molding needs›
Polycarbonate (PC)Discuss clarity and impact needs›
Nylon (PA)Review moisture and wear conditions›
POM / AcetalReview fit and sliding features›
PEEKDiscuss operating conditions›
PTFEReview friction and chemical exposure›
ULTEM / PEIDiscuss thermal and electrical needs›Confirm grade availability and application requirements.
TPU / TPEReview flexibility and processing›
EPDMReview weathering and chemical exposure.›
NBRReview oil and fuel exposure.›
FKMReview temperature and chemical exposure.›
G10 / FR4Review insulation and laminate needs›
CompositesReview stiffness, weight and laminate.›Customer-Specified MaterialsConfirm your grade and requirements.›Other Specialty MaterialsDiscuss your application and grade.›Practical guidance for your part geometry and material decisions.
Prepare your process, budget and sourcing questions.
Build your knowledge before production.
Learn who we are and how we operate.
Find our U.S. support team or start a conversation.

YOUR PART. YOUR REVIEW QUESTION. YOUR EVIDENCE.
Explore enclosure, machining and prototype planning examples. Compare the drawing, process and acceptance questions your team should resolve before using another project as a reference.
These are illustrative engineering scenarios, not LK MFG customer case studies or verified savings and test results.
Identify board mounts, connectors, access openings, mating cover and installation envelope.
Review geometry, quantity, material, finish and assembly before choosing machining, forming or another route.
Agree critical dimensions, contact areas, appearance and required records.
A custom enclosure manufacturing case study is useful when its requirements and evidence are comparable to yours. A photograph alone does not establish suitability.
Review sheet metal fabrication →

Compare the proposed geometry change with the function it must preserve. These two concepts illustrate different tool access; they are not a documented redesign or approved interchangeable parts.
Identify which pocket, corner, wall, hole or setup would change and why it needs review.
Review mating parts, loads, clearance and critical drawing requirements before approving a change.
Agree the revised drawing and required sample evidence. Do not accept an undocumented adjustment as the production baseline.
When reading a prototype to production case study, ask which material, geometry, process and acceptance conditions changed between stages.
What did the sample demonstrate: appearance, fit, a specific function or another agreed requirement?
Which drawing, process, material and checks were approved for repeat supply?
Which records, packing requirements and change approvals carry forward to the next order?


Assume Route A has setup 100 and unit cost 8; Route B has setup 500 and unit cost 4. All values are hypothetical cost units, not USD, quotes or LK MFG prices.
Total = setup + quantity × unit cost. At 100 parts both routes equal 900 units; at 200 parts A = 1,700 and B = 1,300. Horizontal scale starts at 0 and ends at 1,700 units. No actual savings are claimed.
A CNC machining case study cost reduction claim needs a defined baseline, approved changes, quantity, comparable material/finish/acceptance and actual commercial evidence. This simplified arithmetic excludes inspection, tooling life, scrap, packing, freight, taxes, lead time and other costs. Compare complete quotes for your real scope.

No. The scenarios and component images are illustrative. They do not document customer parts, measured results or commercial savings.
Not automatically. Compare geometry, material, quantity, function and acceptance requirements for your own drawing.
Identify proposed deviations and obtain the required approval before using a revised baseline. Keep drawing and sample records aligned.
Only under its disclosed hypothetical assumptions. Your complete quotation and required production scope determine the actual comparison.
Choose your learning route → · Review supplier evidence → · Review design guidelines →